Complaint Opinion 14-07
- Date
- 09/02/2014
- Number
- Complaint 2014 - No. 7
- Topic
- Campaign Use of Public Resources
- Respondent
- Hurst
- Question/Complaint
It was alleged that Respondent used his legislative phone to assist or oppose judicial candidates, that his involvement in the campaign constituted a conflict of interest, and that his actions constituted extortion.
- Summary
No state phone was used. Conflict of interest statute is inapplicable and extortion is a criminal offense and beyond the jurisdiction of the Ethics Board. Case dismissed for lack of reasonable cause on election issue (RCW 42.52.180) and for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction on extortion claim.
- Document
- Ethicscom2014.07 (PDF 67.04 Kilobytes)