Skip to main content
Home  / About the Legislature  / Ethics  / Ethics complaint opinions  / Complaint 2014 - No. 7

Complaint Opinion 14-07

Date
09/02/2014
Number
Complaint 2014 - No. 7
Topic
Campaign Use of Public Resources
Respondent
Hurst
Question/Complaint

​It was alleged that Respondent used his legislative phone to assist or oppose judicial candidates, that his involvement in the campaign constituted a conflict of interest, and that his actions constituted extortion.

Summary

​No state phone was used.  Conflict of interest statute is inapplicable and extortion is a criminal offense and beyond the jurisdiction of the Ethics Board.  Case dismissed for lack of reasonable cause on election issue (RCW 42.52.180) and for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction on extortion claim.

Document
Ethicscom2014.07 (PDF 67.04 Kilobytes)
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙